Given the testimony from today’s court
case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney,
Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of course, was Obama.
The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings. Promptly at 9am
EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility case were
called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a very interesting
beginning to this long awaited and important case.
The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution and
whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point, if
found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in
Georgia.
With the small courtroom crowded, several in attendance could be seen
fanning themselves with pamphlets as they waited for the return of the
attorneys and the appearance of the judge.
Obama himself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of course was nowhere
near Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a campaign swing appearing in Las
Vegas and in Colorado, at tax payer expense, ignoring the court in
Georgia.
Over the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had
attempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward. He
first tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it was irrelevant to
Obama. After that, Jablonski argued that a state could not, under the
law, determine who would or would not be on a ballot and later, that
Obama was simply too busy with the duties of office to appear.
After all these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia Court,
Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State
attempting to place Obama above the law and declared that the case was
not to he heard and neither he nor his client would participate.
Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later telling
Jablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate but that
he would do so at his and his clients peril.
It appears Jablonski is not in attendance as the attorneys return, all
go to the plaintiff table 24 minutes after meeting in the judge’s
chambers.
Has Obama’s attorney made good on his stated threat not to participate?
Is he directly ignoring the court’s subpoena? Is he placing Obama above
the law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed to appear in court, would
we or our attorney be allowed such action or, non action?
Certainly not.
Court is called to order.
Obama’s birth certificate is entered
into evidence.
Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya
East Africa is entered into evidence.
Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book,
“Dreams from My Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is
where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is
mentioned. It states that his father’s passport had been revoked and he
was unable to leave Kenya.
Immigration Services documents entered
into evidence regarding Obama Sr.
June 27th, 1962, is the date on those
documents. Obama’s father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United
States. Documents were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.
Testimony regarding the definition of
Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a
Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the
difference between “citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and
copies of the Minor vs Happersett opinion.
It is also pointed out that the 14th
Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of
Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict
with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court
Minor vs Happersett opinion.
The point is, to be a natural born
citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in
question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama’s father was not a
citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to
serve as President.
Judge notes that as neither Obama nor
his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.
Carl Swinson takes the stand.
Testimony is presented that the SOS
has agreed to hear this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of
Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge to it by Swinson.
2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the
stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s
appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy.
Court records of Obama’s mother and
father entered into evidence.
Official certificate of nomination of
Obama entered into evidence.
RNC certificate of nomination entered
into evidence.
DNC language does NOT include language
stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a
direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have
known that Obama was not qualified.
Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday
entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not
take place and that they would not participate.
Dreams From My Father entered.
Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.
Disc received from Immigration and
Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains
information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the
Freedom of Information Act.
This information states clearly that
Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.
At this point, the judge takes a
recess.
The judge returns.
David Farrar takes the stand.
Evidence showing Obama’s book of
records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by
the judge.
Attorney Ms. Orly Taitz calls 2nd
witness. Mr. Strump.
Enters into evidence a portion of
letter received from attorney showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother
for her passport listing Obama’s last name something other than Obama.
State Licensed PI takes the stand.
She was hired to look into Obama’s
background and found a Social Security number for him from 1977.
Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number
used or attached to Obama in 1977, shows that Obama was born in the
1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else
who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.
Same SS number came up with addresses
in IL, D.C. and MA.
Next witness takes the stand.
This witness is an expert in
information technology and photo shop. He testifies that the birth
certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered.
This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate
have been lifted from more than one original document.
Linda Jordan takes the stand.
Document entered regarding SS number
assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E Verify. It comes
back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government
verifies ones citizenship.
Next witness.
Mr. Gogt.
Expert in document imaging and
scanners for 18 years.
Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth
certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines
around all the type face is caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop.
Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.
States this is a product of layering.
Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight
scan of an original document would not show such layering.
Also testifies that the date stamps
shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various
documents as they are hand stamped. Obama’s documents are all even,
straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped but
layered into the document by computer.
Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former
police officer and former immigration officer specializing in
immigration fraud. Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that
the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of Connecticut .
Obama never resided in that state. At the time of issue, Obama was
living in Hawaii.
Serial number on birth certificate is
out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification
is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of
Obama.
Mr. Sampson also states that portion
of documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted
which is highly unusual with regards to immigra tion records.
Suggests all records from Social
Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth records be made available to see if
there are criminal charges to be filed or not. Without them, nothing can
be ruled out.
Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is
shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until
all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a
U.S. Citizen.
Taitz shows records for Barry Soretoro
aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the
same time.
Taitz takes the stand herself.
Testifies that records indicate Obama
records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.
Taitz leave the stand to make her
closing arguments.
Taitz states that Obama should be
found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as
President.
And with that, the judge closes the
hearing.
What can we take away from this?
It’s interesting.
Now, all of this has finally been
entered OFFICIALLY into court records.
One huge question is now more than
ever before, unanswered.
WHO THE HELL IS THIS GUY?
Without his attorney present, Obama’s
identity, his Social Security number, his citizenship status, and his
past are all OFFICIALLY in question.
One thing to which there seems no
doubt. He does NOT qualify, under the definition of Natural Born
Citizen” provided by SCOTUS opinions, to be eligible to serve as
President.
What will the judge decide? That is
yet to be known, but it seems nearly impossible to believe, without
counter testimony or evidence, because Obama and his attorney chose not
to participate, that Obama will be allowed on the Georgia ballot.
It also opens the door for such cases
pending or to be brought in other states as well.
Obama is in it deep and the DNC has
some…a LOT…of explaining to do unless they start looking for a new
candidate for 2012.
