Skip to content
Truth or Fiction?
  • Home
  • Fact Checks
    • Politics
    • Fake News
    • Viral Content
    • Entertainment
  • Search
  • Fake News
  • Politics
  • Viral Content
  • Reporting
    • Analysis
    • Disinformation
    • Entertainment
    • Identifying Fake News
    • News Media
  • About
    • About
    • Disclosures
    • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Reporting
  • ‘Choose’ or ‘Pick’ Your ‘Quarantine House’ and Other Engagement Bait During COVID-19

‘Choose’ or ‘Pick’ Your ‘Quarantine House’ and Other Engagement Bait During COVID-19

Identifying Fake News, Reporting / By Kim LaCapria / April 14, 2020 April 14, 2020

Chances are in early April 2020 you saw many “choose your quarantine house” or “pick your quarantine house” memes on social media, the global pandemic version of “would you live in a cabin with no wifi for a month for a million dollars?”

The “quarantine house” memes were as popular as they were diverse, polling users on a variety of putative homes based on food groups, entertainment types, and other topics.

“Choose Your Quarantine House,” the Premise

The memes contained hypothetical scenarios in which readers had several “houses” from which to choose for their periods of quarantine. Each house had a few things (like fried chicken and weighted blankets), but lacked others (such as Netflix or a pool).

Users assessed the various “quarantine houses,” commenting about which was most favorable to them and sharing the meme on.

“Pick Your Quarantine House” Meme Examples

Some common topics were sports:

Or museums:

Or, quite frequently, music:

Various foods represented a common “quarantine house” poll, in groups:

Iterations of the “choose your quarantine house” meme also spread on Twitter, typically on the same subjects:

Which house would YOU choose to stay in during quarantine? ☣️#poppunk #emo #quarantinehouses pic.twitter.com/Oi7oVCVQyy

— Sage Haley (@SagexHaley) April 13, 2020

Hello fam! In which house would you wanna be and why?#YAING#QuarantineHouse pic.twitter.com/G8bCb6cI9y

— YAI NG (@YAING17) April 11, 2020

Which Choices #QuarantineHouse would you want to stay in? 🤔🏡 pic.twitter.com/vzFbIs6hgx

— Choices (@PlayChoices) April 10, 2020

Which celeb quarantine house would you pick? pic.twitter.com/K8oGl4C5zv

— WhenInManila.com (@WhenInManila) April 13, 2020

Choose your #Quarantine House 🏠 pic.twitter.com/xScTJVGswC

— GROW/N (@growngrl) April 8, 2020

Who Shared “Quarantine House” Memes?

A number of individuals shared the memes as seen above (although such behavior is common for multi-level marketers, often to further their overall Facebook reach and recruit additional victims.)

As illustrated above, the meme was a favorite of brands and business pages. The reason was obvious — readers were likely to weigh in and share the viral and topical meme, driving the rates of brands’ engagement way up.

Do “Quarantine House” Memes Have a Downside?

We’ve discussed the topic of engagement bait before (as opposed to clickbait) — content (often low-value) shared solely to generate likes and shares to benefit page owners.

Show Me Some Examples of Engagement Bait!

It appears in the form of warnings or “good advice”:

‘Don’t Abbreviate 2020’ Warning

Incitements to comment and share:

Facebook #HocusPocus ‘Witch Checker’

Calls to charity or assistance:

Is Facebook Donating $1 for Every Share Towards a Puppy’s Tumor?

Does This Grandma Want You to Share Her Photo to Mark Her 100th Birthday?

Freebies:

Santorini Holidays Facebook Giveaway Scam

Purported personality quizzes:

Do the Colors You See in a Photograph Reveal Left or Right Brain Dominance?

And lies about things likely to enrage people:

Does Facebook Deem Images of 9/11 Offensive and Prohibit Them?

How Could All Those Random Things Be Engagement Bait? What Does Hocus Pocus Have to Do with 9/11 or a Shoe?

You’re right — on first glance, those topics look completely disparate and possibly legitimate. But under the surface, they share a common unifying trait. Their entire purpose is to farm your likes, comments, and shares — the currency Facebook calls “engagement.”

On the page about the puppy’s tumor (the puppy did not have a tumor), we explained:

Although page owners commented several days after it was posted to admit that the image did not show an ailing puppy, that message was buried in the many comments and not prominently displayed on the original post. Because of this, the page was able to continue racking up and benefiting from likes, shares, and comments as the dishonest post made its way around Facebook.

As many commenters noted, the post’s intent appeared to be “engagement bait,” luring users to interact with the post and amplify the “Therapy Dogs Give Love” page’s profile on Facebook via a popular share.

In some cases, engagement bait is presented as it is in the manner above — simply by using Facebook’s structure in a dishonest way to boost a page’s statistics. In that format, occasionally a pointless action is requested from users in order to create the artificial impression of an interested user base. Sometimes the page then undergoes a transformation, changing its name and description after a certain number of users join the group or page.

But in other applications, engagement bait has more sinister connotations. Pages and entities of dubious intent entice people to engage with a page to rapidly build an audience, often offering phony enticements or giveaways. In the case of the pug-with-an-avocado, the standard 10 or 25 cents “donation” plea was raised to a dollar, likely driving the six-figure share count on the post.

And on the “Grandma’s 100th birthday” page:

In the grand scheme of things, whether the poster’s grandma genuinely wanted her image shared across Facebook was largely immaterial. The post itself was of little consequence in the landscape of misinformation — but even minor instances of posting clickbait or engagement bait were emblematic of the innocuous ways in which Facebook’s algorithms were manipulated and easily exploited with dishonest practices.

Can That Be a Bad Thing?

On the page about the vacation scam (Santorini Holidays), we explained how engagement bait can pose some risk to sharers:

The “Santorini Holidays” scam is not as low-risk as it appears at first glance, as “likes” and “shares” also put Facebook users at risk of encountering malware, among other things. Like-farming victims often soon find their profiles tacitly endorsing scams, hate pages, and other unpleasant endeavors that are unlikely to accrue engagement through legitimate means. Genuine contests and giveaways, particularly of valuable experiences or objects, are extremely rare; furthermore, they are almost always conducted through official channels for big-name brands and well-known companies.

What if I Really Want to Share “Quarantine House” Memes?

As explained in numerous examples, engagement bait isn’t always necessarily a risk — but it is a nuisance. However, there’s a simple way to share the popular content of the day without polluting social media with multi-level marketing recruiters or other scam pages.

If you like a particular “Pick Your Quarantine House” or “Choose Your Quarantine House” meme, right-click and save it to your phone or desktop. Then upload it to your own page and share it that way. This disconnects the chain of possible engagement bait, while still allowing you to share the memes and invite friends to the discussion. Enjoy.

Comments

Article Sources +
  • ‘Don’t Abbreviate 2020’ Warning
  • Facebook Claims We’re ‘Clickbait.’ And It Won’t Explain Why.
  • Facebook #HocusPocus ‘Witch Checker’
  • Is Facebook Donating $1 for Every Share Towards a Puppy’s Tumor?
  • Does This Grandma Want You to Share Her Photo to Mark Her 100th Birthday?
  • Santorini Holidays Facebook Giveaway Scam
  • Does Facebook Deem Images of 9/11 Offensive and Prohibit Them?
  • Do the Colors You See in a Photograph Reveal Left or Right Brain Dominance?
Share
Share
Reddit
WhatsApp
Email
Tweet

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post →

Help Fight Misinformation.

Contribute Now

100% of contributions go towards research and editorial costs.

Recent Posts

  • Did Elon Musk Tweet ‘If $GME Reach $1000 I Will Put the GameStop Logo on My Next Rocket’?
  • Is the Average Rent $1,234 a Month, Necessitating a $30.77 Hourly Wage to Afford to Live?
  • Is the Biden Administration Ending Federal Use of Private Prisons?
  • ‘Still the Best Picture of #BernieSanders Sitting Though’
  • Is Lloyd Austin Considering ‘Defunding’ or ‘Maybe Disbanding’ the U.S. Army?

Popular Posts

‘Clinton Body Count’ Rumors‘Clinton Body Count’ Rumors31K Total Shares
Origin of the Word ‘Spinster’Origin of the Word ‘Spinster’24K Total Shares
Muslim Students Question Swiss Handshake Custom-Truth!18K Total Shares
Pokémon Creator Admits Game is Anti-Christian, Created for Satanists-Fiction!18K Total Shares
Hillary Clinton Sold Weapons to ISIS-Fiction!13K Total Shares
Ford Foundation Donates $100 Million to Black Lives Matter-Truth! & Fiction!13K Total Shares
Prayer Request for Dakota Miller, Boy Who Accidentally Shot HimselfPrayer Request for Dakota Miller, Boy Who Accidentally Shot Himself11K Total Shares
Clinton Researcher Victor Thorn Found Dead-Truth!7K Total Shares
UN Backs Secret Obama Takeover of Police-Fiction!7K Total Shares
Hillary Clinton once supported Black Panthers on trial for murder-Truth!7K Total Shares
Copyright © 2021 What's True Incorporated
  • Home
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • About
  • Disclosures